Polysage · Prediction history
Electronic cricket fights for Polymarket odds
Connect wallet Telegram
Back

Prediction history

Market #1126504

2/5/2026, 00:06:37 gpt-5-mini
Signal Sell Horizon Short-term Current price 20¢

Market implies ~20% probability but fundamental assessment is substantially lower; good liquidity and tight spread allow exiting at present prices.

Triggers Signed treaty or enacted U.S. legislation that clearly transfers sovereignty or creates exclusive U.S. jurisdiction in Greenland · Official, joint confirmation from the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland that a specific area will be ceded or placed under exclusive U.S. control · Public breakthrough in negotiations (formal agreement text released) specifying cession or Guantánamo-style exclusive jurisdiction
Yes bearish ↓ Edge -12% Confidence 60%

Transfer of Greenland territory to the U.S. faces major diplomatic, legal, and political barriers (Danish sovereignty, Greenland autonomy, lack of precedent). Market price (0.20) appears elevated versus a low objective probability; orderbook shows large liquidity and low volatility, suggesting stale/speculative positioning rather than new fundamental information.

2/4/2026, 18:07:12 gpt-5-mini
Signal Sell Horizon Medium-term Current price 21¢

Market appears materially overpricing the chance of a binding transfer by end-2026; fundamentals and current geopolitical signals imply a very low probability.

Triggers Signed treaty or enacted legislation transferring sovereignty or granting exclusive U.S. jurisdiction in part of Greenland · Official, detailed agreement from U.S., Denmark, and Greenland establishing U.S. primary/exclusive control · Major political shift (e.g., rapid Greenland independence) coupled with explicit U.S. acquisition plan
Yes bearish ↓ Edge -18% Confidence 70%

Acquisition requires a binding transfer of sovereignty or exclusive jurisdiction; Denmark and Greenland are politically and legally unlikely to cede territory or sovereignty, and there is no credible sign of such an agreement. Market price (~21%) is far above my estimated probability (~3%).

2/4/2026, 12:05:33 gpt-5-mini
Signal Sell Horizon Medium-term Current price 20¢

Model probability materially below market price (negative edge); trade the gap while liquidity is high.

Triggers Signed, binding treaty or enacted U.S. legislation transferring sovereignty or exclusive jurisdiction · Formal, authoritative announcements from U.S., Danish, or Greenland governments indicating an imminent sovereignty transfer · Credible news of a negotiated Guantánamo-style exclusive jurisdiction agreement
Yes bearish ↓ Edge -14% Confidence 75%

Real-world likelihood of the U.S. acquiring Greenland by end-2026 is low given diplomatic, legal, and political obstacles; market price (20%) looks elevated versus realistic treaty/sovereignty probability (~5–8%). Orderbook/liquidity are healthy but do not overcome the substantive low-probability fundamentals.

2/4/2026, 06:06:13 gpt-5-mini
Signal Sell Horizon To expiry Current price 20¢

Model implied probability ~5% vs market 20% (edge -0.15); sell to capture overpricing given strong diplomatic, legal, and political obstacles.

Triggers Signed treaty or legally binding agreement transferring sovereignty or granting exclusive U.S. jurisdiction · Passage of enabling legislation in U.S. and formal Danish consent · Official announcement of a binding jurisdiction/control instrument (not a memorandum) with text
Yes bearish ↓ Edge -15% Confidence 80%

Acquisition/sovereignty transfer of Greenland by the U.S. by end-2026 is geopolitically and legally unlikely within the timeframe; market price (20%) appears to overstate the probability despite high liquidity and stable pricing.

2/4/2026, 00:06:21 gpt-5-mini
Signal Sell Horizon Medium-term Current price 20¢

Model probability (~3%) well below market-implied 20%; fundamentals do not support current price even with apparent buy-side liquidity.

Triggers Signed treaty or legislation transferring sovereignty or exclusive jurisdiction to the U.S. · Official joint announcement from U.S. and Denmark of a binding agreement ceding territory/control · Major shift in Danish or Greenland policy explicitly offering territory or jurisdiction to the U.S.
Yes bearish ↓ Edge -17% Confidence 70%

Strong legal and political barriers (Danish sovereignty, Greenland autonomy), historical precedent (2019 rejection), and no public binding treaties make acquisition very unlikely; market price 0.20 appears overstated despite buy-side depth.